#Error on teamviewer gmbh monitor how to

Therefore the interface of the ENow Management Suite is quite handsome, as it displays all statuses in a dashboard. Monitoring servers should not be a time-consuming task for an application administrator. A significant feature is the ability to provide reports to different groups of stakeholders. The default set of reports fits most reporting needs, but you can set up individual reports as well. Mailscape 365 is part of the ENow Management Suite which monitors your Exchange Online and Hybrid Exchange deployment inclusive of required hybrid components like AD FS and DirSync.Ĭompass is the part of the ENow Management Suite which monitors domain controllers and Active Directory specific topics.įoreSite is the part of the ENow Management Suite which monitors your SharePoint farms and the related SQL database servers.īesides monitoring the vitals of the application components and the infrastructure requirements (network, AD, etc.), the solution provides an extensive reporting functionality. Mailscape is the part of the ENow Management Suite which helps you to monitor the messaging infrastructure components like Exchange Server, Blackberry Enterprise Server, and SMTP relay servers.

The ENow Management Suite supports your monitoring efforts for: In a world where “always-on” is the business goal for a mobile workforce, downtime of messaging and collaboration systems is an issue. In the current IT landscape where messaging and collaboration solutions provide business functionality at a large scale and are set up in high-availability configurations, the monitoring of such implementations from an application perspective is crucial. If DNS resolution does not work, the agent responds with an error to central management even when the DNS server itself is reachable by the system monitoring probe. For example, the agent checks that DNS name resolution works using the configured DNS servers on the server. The agent itself performs checks depended on the application running on the same server. This approach provides the ability to monitor from an application perspective. In comparison to system monitoring the application monitoring approach looks very different, as the following figure shows:Īpplication monitoring relies on the existence of agents installed locally on the servers hosting the applications. You can find a link to PRTG at the end of this post. You can enhance the monitoring capabilities with individual scripts, programs, and libraries. The solution illustrated uses PRTG, which is a network monitoring solution that supports all standard protocols for monitoring. The following diagram illustrates the system monitoring approach, where a probe connects to a target and queries data using a dedicated protocol supported by the target (e.g., SNMP, WMI, SSH, etc.).

#Error on teamviewer gmbh monitor how to

The fact is that both monitoring approaches have different procedures on how to control. System monitoring and application monitoring systems sometimes share an intersecting set of “things” they can monitor.

On the other hand, the business is highly interested in implementing an individual monitoring solution to reduce the overall licensing cost (priority 1), reduce the number of servers required to host monitoring solutions (priority 2) and to eliminate the need for technical training (priority 3). Therefore there is not and will never be a single monitoring solution to combine different interests in the information. Vice versa, the same is true for application administrators. They do not care about application-related monitoring as those information's are out of the scope of their daily work. By nature system administrators focus on system-related counters and objects to observe. When it comes to monitoring applications, administrators often disagree with system administrators on what to monitor and which thresholds to configure.